Hooking Up: The "Browning" of America

HOOKING UP: The “Browning” of America

By: Matthew C. Stelly

            The status of the white race, so dependent upon future generationis of white women that were expected to be as racist as their foremothers, appears to be on shakey ground.  A recent study by the Institute for American Values (which translates to mean the Institute for Racism, in my book) showed that the white girls on college campuses all over the nation are as sick and frustrated as the white man used to be.  Maybe even moreso.

            But before we get to that, let’s look a minute at how white people continue to steal from black people and the impact that black culture and language have on a majority white culture that is hungry for creativity.

            The name of the study was, “Hooking Up, Hanging Out and Hoping for Mr. Right: College Women on Mating and Dating Today.” Check out how they freely use our terminology: “hooking up, ” “joined at the hip” and “hanging out.”  When you add to these the other terms their white collegians have ripped off – “from the get go,” “booty call,” “homey,” etc. Then, these white professors – I saw the author on the “Today” show – sit around and attempt to “operationally define” the words that they didn’t even create. Then, after they do that, they publish and sound “urbane” when, in reality, they are nothing more than talentless segregationists who wouldn’t last more than an hour in the REAL inner city.

            Now, according to the report, there are 100 women on campus for every 79 men. I interpret this to mean that they are analyzing raw numbers. That means that they included black men and black women. That means that white girls are going to be more likely than not to go after black males – especially the ones that they find “marketable.” I say this because, according to this study, 83% of the coeds considered marriage an important goal, and 63% hoped to find their future husband in college. But when we add the party scene and the general sluttishness of these white girls once they get away from mommy and daddy, it becomes clear that the black male – as well as Latino brothers – will be targets.

            The white family has been in trouble for some time, and this lends more credence to my theory. According to the study, if the women came from divorced families, they were not only more eager to marry, but also were more eager to marry sooner.

            This “next generation of social leaders,” as the report called them, are going to be a key in the gradual “browning” of American society. While white men are forming their own groups, engaging in homosexual activity at an unprecedented rate, and sitting around destroying their sperm counts with beer drinking contests, the white girl is looking for a mate. An excerpt from the report clearly demonstrates my point:

"On most campuses today there is a widely recognized practice, usually called "hooking up," that explicitly allows sexual interaction without commitment or even affection ... Hook ups can occur between two people on just one occasion, or they can occur more than once between the same two people over a period of weeks or months. The most common definition we heard was that a hook up is anything 'ranging from kissing to having sex," and that it takes place outside the context of commitment."

            White girls have been “hooking up” for a long time, but only it was being done behind closed doors with black athletes. Look at all the stars that end up with white girls, especially when the latter group finds out that these brothers have a shot at professional ball. If not that, a brother who is intelligent and “marketable” can also win them over, because the social myth continues to place emphasis on sexuality. And white girls, more than black girls, are more willing to fight that social interracial taboo and you need only look around to see that. Children of divorce, ignored by their family, sent off to college and lonely for the most part, a black man may be viewed as occupying the same “semi-oppressed” class as the white female – with the black female being the most oppressed, by far (this is Calvin Hernton’s theory, not mine).

            So now they’re behind closed doors on campuses where there are more white women than white men, and this black hunk is all by himself on the campus because of selective admissions policies. What’s gonna stop that blonde from “venturing” down the dormitory hallway at night and engaging in some “jungle fever.” The brother, for the most part, is gonna be “up for it” in more ways than one.

            The lack of “cool” on the part of most white researchers enable them to be duped and to arrive at “square” conclusions, ala John Howard Griffin in Black Like Me and Elloitt Lebow in Tally’s Corner. In this case, the concept of “dating” is defined in the following way:

"... probably few parents or older adults are aware of how extraordinarily different 'dating' is today. In our on-campus interviews we found that no term for interactions between college women and men holds more ambiguity, and reflects more confusion, than the word 'dating'. Indeed, there are at least four separate ways that the word is used ... A UC-Berkeley student observed, 'There really is not much ... dating it's like people either just start hanging out together and live together and they are boyfriend and girlfriend. Or, they just like do random hook ups and whatever and go into relationships.'"

            Look folks: black and white. When you hear a girl talk about “I used to ‘date’ this guy, she means she FUCKED him. Plain and simple. To this generation and a large number of the baby boomers, dating moved from the back seat of the ’57 Chevy to a dorm room and to a hotel room. Look at Condit and Clinton and Henry Cisneros and Ben Chavis – married men who still wanted to “Date” women. What do you think “date” means? Vernon Jordan got shot in the ass back in 1981, on his way to “have tea” with a white woman.

            Black people invented the term “joined at the hip.” We used to say it in the ‘70s to tease the guys who walked their girls to their lockers and that kind of thang. Now here they come with it, trying to define it in such a way that they hope to salvage some hope for the female and the pale.

            But it won’t work. White girls are calling the shots, and many of them are tired of listening while their men call us “niggers” and crack jokes about us – behind our backs. They are growing bored with childish kid games that more often than not lead to someone getting hurt or maimed. These are women, after all, who are the keys to the procreation of the white race – she is the only one who can lay down with the white male and produce a white child. Any other women produces a child of color.

            Could this then, be the reason for the selective admissions policies, which have led to campuses across America being whiter and whiter? Could this be why affirmative action was cut back on these campuses? Is this why there are so many “private” institutions? How else to explain how, in a culture that espouses diversity, finances multiculturalism and boasts to the world of racial equality, why their college campuses – which train future generations – are lily white, conservative and racist to the core?

            White folks were already a world-wide minority even before the 1970s started. Now, with a generation that is outright STEALING black culture because of their love for it, hanging out with black kids, wearing styles influenced by the ghetto and the barrio, and whose music stars get fame by stealing from blacks, the “browning” of America is well underway.  I say that the writing is on the wall. This study and its findings, in my view, simply CONFIRMED it.