·
REVIEW: ‘We Are All The Same: The Story of a Boy’s Courage and a
Mother’s Love’
The author of this book, Jim Wooten, appeared on a November 15, 2004 segment
of “Good Morning America.” The book raises serious questions about AIDS in Africa , but as this review will show, goes much further:
straight into the bowels of racism. The following response was written in 1998, I believe.
After hearing what Wooten had to say, I ordered the book.
What a waste of snaps.
The book is about a South African boy, Nkosi, whose mother
had AIDS and, before dying, passed it on to him. Born in 1989, Nkosi died at
the tender age of 12 from the disease. Although the book makes positive and
productive points about the African tendency to shun those who had AIDS, and
how Thabo Mkebi hampered attempts to get anti-retroviral drugs to those
suffering from AIDS (a debatable point), the book is actually a cover for white
supremacy on a number of levels.
First of all, the author himself, a correspondent for ABC
News. He is covering the continent and watched all of this take place. But at
no point in this book does he address the fact that it was the white man who
bought AIDS to South Africa .
At no point in the book does he address the mythological basis of the Green
Monkey theory. Instead, focusing on this lovely young boy, the theme of
Wooten’s book is to show how this child “died gracefully.”
First of all, all children that age die gracefully because
they have no real concept of what death is all about. That’s why some of these
youngsters can point guns at each other and pull a trigger, because they’ve
been programmed by TV that death is temporary. In Nkosi’s case, he understood
what the disease was about, but he did something about it: he and his mother
filed lawsuits to get him into a regular school and from those actions, other
children stricken with the virus were able to attend school as well.
Secondly, when it comes to blacks, “dying gracefully” seems
to be a recurring theme. From referring to dying as “going home,” to Malcolm’s
speech about how white folks teach us to “suffer peacefully,” this whole idea
of death and dying has two prongs; one for blacks and one for whites. When it’s
them, it’s programs, organizations, telethons and million dollar research
projects. When it’s us, it’s “he was black, but he had a white heart” as they
say or imply with Gunga Din, Booker T. Washington, Ray Charles, and others who
tow the company line.
Third, Wooten spends more time dealing with the fact that
Nkosi’s foster mother was a white woman than he does the important issues I’ve
pointed out. Why? Because in typical “missionary” fashion, Wooten wants to
paint a picture of the white man as saviour. That is what he, in writing this
book, is also doing for himself. The jacket of the book claims, “This powerful
account puts a human face on a catastrophic epidemic …” Yeah – the face of the
victims, but not the face of the culprits who manufactured the disease in the
first place. Every white person in this book is an expert or a savior; most of
the black people, other thank Nkosi, are silent bystanders.
Fourth, guess who the mother is? There is of course,
Daphne, his biological mother, a dying sister who, as Wooten writes, “moved
heaven and earth” to make sure that Nkosi would be provided for after her
death. But when you read the book, Daphne doesn’t get as much play as the
foster mother – a white woman named Gail Johnson. To her credit, she adopted
the child and started a hospice, Nkosi’s Haven, for women and children with
AIDS in South Africa .
What is NOT mentioned is that she gets grant funding for doing so. You do the
math.
A fifth point is this: the title. Why? Who is “we”? And if
it is a truly collective and unified “we,” why must we all “be the same”? Why
can’t we all be different, and yet have the same goal, that of freedom? No,
that would be too much diversity for the white man to handle. So, in reality,
this book has nothing to do with sameness. The African continent is the only
one that is headed for extermination. Not Europe .
Not Asia . So then, where is the sameness?
If we are all the same, then why did white folks in Nkosi’s
South Africa see fit to create a system of Apartheid while, in this country,
their cousins had a situation called Jim Crow? If we are all the same, then why
was there two music charts: one for “R&B” and one for “Pop”? If we are all
the same, then why can brothers who are 6-feet tall dunk, and very few white
dudes can?
We are NOT all the same, that’s why. This is the white man
talking. When he says he’s “color blind,” what he means is that he’s ignoring
what race you are and judging you from the only perspective he has; a white
one. When he says “we’re all the same,” he can’t prove it. Even his Bible wants
to make you think that you’re the “cursed descendant of Ham”! And what was the
curse: according to the white minister, it’s black skin!
We are NOT all the same. This is not to say that this is
not what he would prefer. He has the majority of our people thinking the way he
does, smiling when ain’t nothing funny, currying favor and carrying water for
him. That is about as far as the “sameness” goes. After working, you head back
to the ghetto and barrio, and he’s on his way to suburbia, created so he could
get away from the likes of you. If we were the “same,” would he be spending
billions of dollars doing that?
Nkosi’s spirit was strong, but no different than what we,
as black people, have right here in our midst. Some of us have been broken, but
many of us have not. While AIDS is a major concern that must be addressed, it
won’t be conquered by alien missionaries who use it as an excuse to beg for
grant money. It starts with us re-defining our relationships with one another
and working on strategies to care for our own people.
Using a dying black child in South Africa to promote mythology
and a white supremacist agenda is wrong. Jim Wooten should be ashamed of
himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment